The verbs which, as a verb helping in the times and the composite moods, require the question of a « tre » require, in all these conjugations, consistency with the subject. Learn more about conformity with the verbs of Being and the passive voice. In fact, to say that the past of participation is true with the direct object presents itself as a better explanation. This is better because then the same rule explains what happens in some rarer cases of reflexive verbs, where the reflexive pronoun is not really the direct object. in reality, we could replace more or less with or without changing the meaning: if you say « or » or « and, » both abilities and experience are understood as necessary. The same is true in French, so that in practice, a pluralistic and noun adjective is linked to or neither: the concordance with the verbs of perception is even more difficult. They only require agreement if the subject of infinitive precedes the verb of perception. Note that none of the verbs in this category (except hatch > hatched) have old entries that end in a consonant. In other words, the « agreement » of these verbs essentially applies only to the language of writing. The most common reflexive verb, in which the past participant could change its pronunciation, is to sit > it sits. In most other common reflexive verbs, the past participant ends in a vowel. For example, in her dress, the extra-e does not change the pronunciation. The agreement with the pronoun verbs is less simple.
In general, since pronoun verbs use « tre » as auxiliary verbs, they must be approved with the subject. If the verb has themes from different people, agree as follows: You and I love French cuisine. (You and I love to cook French.) 2. Person – 1. Subjects take `us` My husband and I love cinema. My husband and I love going to the movies. 3. Person – 1.
No one the themes take `us` Your husband and you like art exhibitions. (You and your husband love art exhibitions.) 3. Person – 2. The subjects of the person take `you` Well, it becomes obvious that it is too easy. Suppose you meant interesting movies and plays. The French word film is masculine, but the word or phrase « play » (theatre) (the French word for « play » in the theatrical sense) is feminine. What agreement should we rely on the interest of the adjective? Similarly, if we mean a red pencil and a pencil (where both elements are red), we make the adjective singular or plural (and again, with what word do we agree)? We found that native speakers in the common language do not tend to enter into participatory agreements with having if they are the norm in formal writings. The same goes for reflexive verbs. For example, the formal written form of this sentence has an earlier participatory agreement with the direct object: in French, in tensions and composite moods, the old entries must sometimes correspond to another part of the sentence, either the subject or the direct object.
It`s a lot like adjectives: If an agreement is needed, you have to add e for feminine themes/objects and s for the pluralist. In reality, speakers do not tend to add agreements with having in daily speech. They probably only make these agreements by speaking carefully and thinking about the written language when they speak. So if they don`t read a script, you could generally say that grammatical tuning is a big topic – and one of the banns of French students.